The Licence Review Process

The goal of the OSI License Review Process is to ensure that licenses and software labeled as "open source" conforms to existing community norms and expectations. For that reason, all licenses must go through a public review process described below. The OSI Board is happy to consult with entities in advance to help them navigate the process and improve their license, but formal approval requires going through license-review.

Purpose of the Process

How to Submit A Request

  • Identify which type of submission (below)
  • Ensure you have appropriate standing to submit such a request
  • Subscribe to license-review (if you aren't already)
  • Submit a formal request to license-review
  • Must include submission type and license name in subject field (to ensure proper tracking)
  • Include or link to an HTML or plaintext copy of the license
  • Include other supporting data, as indicated below
  • Ask the license proliferation category for approved licenses
    • Explain rationale for recategorizing, according to defined categories
    • Link to earlier public discussions (if any)

    For Retirement

    By: License Steward (only)

    • Specify exactly which version is being retired
    • Identify successor license(s), if any

    For Legacy Approval

    By: License Steward or Interested Licensee

    Retroactive approval of historic/legacy licenses that have already been extensively used by an existing community, but have not previously been approved.

    For Approval

    By: License Steward

    Approval of completely new licenses, or licenses previously used by only a single entity
    • Submit before final, whenever possible, to allow for revisions based on feedback
    • Clearly state rationale for a new license
    • Compare to and contrast with the most similar OSI-approved license(s)
    • Provide results of any legal analysis available
    • Recommend which license proliferation category is appropriate

    What Will Happen

    1. The License Review community will discuss on the mailing list for at least 30 days
    2. The Trac Maintainers will file appropriate tickets
    3. The License Review Chair will summarize and present recommendations to OSI Board (and copy the list)
    4. The OSI Board will make the final decision, or requests for additional information, at the next monthly meeting
    5. The License Review Chair will report back to the List
    6. If Approved, the OSI Website will be updated as appropriate

Comments

Tiemann suggests this: 9.

Tiemann suggests this:

9. The chairman of the committee writes a press release and runs it past license-discuss, who has a chance to add their (possibly negative) input. It then gets posted to opensource.org's news page. The idea is to improve transparency and coordination, and to allow the community to be heard rather than feeling like they're being swept under the rug.